CO129-541-11 Cheng Kwok Yau- trial judge's notes 1-1-1932 - 31-12-1932 — Page 31

31

All evidence apninet «agmoy".?

Lau's wife's evidmCO ELISA)

relevant to proof of agmoy?

Oromi, through Zimmeri,has offered evidence that prisoner know

of murder from Amuh, who told him re.Lai Ming Fay's demnicis-

t101.

Admissibility, Dove rely on form of indictment

distinction. Crown has not argued that the two plots are one.

Reg.v.Harris" (withdraws from Juryt).

#R.v.Loverový" (1990)3.K.B.c43(ruling follows from cross-

exmrsiuntion). (videnos of illegal operation admits hearsay

evidence at if corroborative with Purcell)

(cited in R. v. Armstrong" (1023) 2.K.B. at p.nes).

(8wlf;of."R.Rodley* (1913) 3.K.B. at p.474.Issues get out).

I videos, inadmissible, the conviction must be qushed.

12.12.1932.

R.v.Cheng Kwok Yau.

O.A.V.

(sd) J.R.Wood

P.J. 31.viii.1938.

Resumed.

Court; Premt.

Counsel, proesut(axcept Potter & Jonkin).

Attomsy Generul,also,present.

Judgment delivered.

Verdict-affirmed.

Lim, for prisoner. Asks Court to say that matter is a question

of public and general importance.

Kauriş Citus;"R.v. Ibrahim record.

Jourt; Do not accede to request.

(sd) J.R.Wood

P.J. 13.ix.1938.